- Scenario: Newly-installed wireless network with all CISCO equipment.
- Strong signal from multiple WAPs (Wireless Access Points) throughout a concrete building.
- DSL connectivity to a DSLAM (DSL Access Multiplexer).
- Poor internet download/upload performance.
- Many articles have been written about overloading a DSLAM
- There may be a bad port on a DSLAM
- The DSLAM itself may be faulty
- The speed of the subscriber line itself as part of the DSL technology is slow
- Weather may impact DSL
- Distance from the CO (central office where phone equipment is stored for a certain NPA/NXX (e.g. 203/847 (Norwalk, CT)) is greater than a certain distance. The distance is, for the most part, debatable, but if you plan on subscribing to DSL, ensure that the distance from the central office is less than (<14000>
- Faulty DSL router
- Faulty DSL line
- SDSL versus ADSL (a totally different topic to discuss) - some say SDSL actually produces slower speeds!
- Speed of line is not actually guaranteed
- Line tests pass, but that is only from the DSL provider's network to the DSL router. If someone wants true Internet, the true test is from outside the DSL provider's network.
- Poorly-configured DSLAM port
- Poorly-configured equipment
- Cross-connect issue
- OSPF (Open Shortest Point First) is misconfigured (e.g. Two routers, one in Stamford, CT and one in New York City. Stamford needs to reach New York City. Instead of communicating in such a way if or when the open shortest point is direct from Stamford, CT, data packets are sent to a router in Los Angeles, CA), producing poor Internet performance
- Poor latency due to multiple factors. One cause is unestablished BGP Peering, where one network has no relations with another network
Personally, I have found that ADSL from AT&T outperforms SDSL from other providers. ADSL is asymmetric "rides" on one of your two existing pairs that exist within a regular phone line. SDSL is symmetric and does not - rides on its own phone line.
The initial thought when DSL was first introduced was that DSL would out-perform Cable. The truth is that Cable is faster and more reliable than DSL!